REBLOG of Dear Teacher: Shut Up or I’ll Starve Your Children

REBLOG of Dear Teacher: Shut Up or I’ll Starve Your Children

I have a friend.

She was a great teacher.

She taught in an inner city high school in Indianapolis, Indiana.

She had been teaching there for 8 years.

Her students worked hard.

She helped them excel.

Then she lost her job.

Why? What could possibly have led to this decision? Well, you’ve heard Rahm Emanuel use “decreased enrollment” as his catch-all phrase/reason for closing Chicago public schools down, right? Well, have you every heard of “decreased enrollment” in ONE CLASS? Me neither.

These kinds of things shouldn’t happen, but they do. They are becoming more and more commonplace. Our public schools ARE under attack.

Read on and see how it happened to THIS teacher. Find out what happens to good teachers, not just the so-called “bad” ones in the current political climate we, teachers, find ourselves in.

Then, join us in the fight of our lives — to save American public schools from being closed down and/or turned around, and made into Common Core factories that push out standardized workers for the future corporate workforce.

Don’t let the corporate money mongers suck the life blood out of our schools AND bleed our taxpayer pocketbooks dry!

 

Advertisements

I worked too damn hard to earn my tenure to have it taken away.

teaching work of heart

This is a story of how one man decided to turn his life upside down to find meaning and purpose. He and his family sacrificed mightily to make it happen. He did something that he came to find that he had a passion for and was really at: He became a TEACHER!!!

He’s right about so much in his tale of his path to becoming a teacher, meaning that as a teacher myself, I recognize the truths that he tells. I also recognize what he calls the NEED for teachers to begin to share their stories so that the general public will begin to understand who we are.

I agree. I will begin working on mine now.

Opine I will

I have worked too hard, much too hard to earn my tenure as a teacher to just sit back and watch ideologues and so called reformers snatch it away from me. Tenure should only be defined as an employee’s right to due process as defined by state law.

When a failed journalist like Campbell Brown uses her name to drive her husband’s education reform agenda  and claims to have the legal backing to eliminate tenure in New York, it becomes instant news. Why is it that eliminating tenure is news while earning tenure is ignored?

I worked too damn hard to earn my tenure, as an elementary school teacher. I will not sit back and watch Brown and her corporate backers rip my due process rights away from me. I struggled and my family sacrificed so that I may enjoy a fulfilling career as a teacher. Now Brown and her cohorts believe…

View original post 1,302 more words

The Vergara Trial Teachers Were Not “Grossly Ineffective”

A big “Thank You” to Diane Ravitch for digging into the facts of this trial to uncover the politics behind plaintiff’s case.

It is INCREDIBLY troublesome when a case so full of holes can make it through a court system that is supposed to be just and fair. What was fair about this outcome?

If the appeal fails to throw out this verdict, we need to fill the streets of this country in protest. I, for one, do not intend to live in a country where corruption and lawlessness are a way of life. That is NOT what our founders envisioned and not what we can let happen to OUR country. It belongs to WE, THE PEOPLE, not to the monied profit-mongers who want to throw good people under the bus in order to take over our schools, our neighborhoods and our civil society.

Let’s all follow this case and publicize it from the point of view that demands FACTS to find justice!

Diane Ravitch's blog

I was curious to learn whether the plaintiffs in the Vergara trial actually had “grossly ineffective teachers.” The answer is “no, they did not.”

Not only did none of them have a “grossly ineffective” teacher, but some of the plaintiffs attended schools where there are no tenured teachers. Two of the plaintiffs attend charter schools, where there is no tenure or seniority, and as you will read below, “Beatriz and Elizabeth Vergara both attend a “Pilot School” in LAUSD that is free to let teachers go at the end of the school year for any reason, including ineffectiveness.

It turns out that the lawyers for the defense checked the records of the plaintiffs’ teachers, and this is what they found (filed as a post-trial brief in the case): (See pp. 5-6).

“Plaintiffs have not established that the statutes have ever caused them any harm or are likely to do…

View original post 611 more words

One Teacher Contemplates Memorial Day Weekend 2014

Image

What do most people do on Memorial Day weekend? Hmmm…I think some travel. I’m pretty sure many get together with family or friends. Barbequing seems to be a popular activity. I suspect others like to get outdoors and engage in sports or some other fun, active endeavor. What am I doing, you ask? I’m a teacher. Any guesses?

I’m procrastinating. That’s what I’m doing. I’m sitting here at my computer, pecking on the keys, throwing words across the screen because I’d rather do anything other than what I need to do right now. I need to complete my portion of my teach evaluation packet (summary of student achievement data and reflection on my professional goals). I also need to begin my student report cards because the last online report card window opened at 4:00 PM on Friday of this holiday weekend. Yep. Opened on a weekend. Doesn’t that imply that I should use this time wisely? And truth be told, there are too many real time distractions at school to complete them there. If others do so, I’d like to see how they did it.

Am I complaining? Yes and no. On the one hand, I love …. uh oh. Choosing the next word isn’t automatic anymore. I had to stop and debate with myself. I was going to say “teaching.” But that’s not so true anymore unless this were May 25, 1991 or so. That’s when I really TAUGHT. Even though I was a relatively new teacher, I wasn’t being told what to do or how to do it. I wasn’t turning in lesson plans to anyone for any reason. The professional goals I made then were entirely up to me. No one dictated how many I HAD to have or what they had to pertain to. That’s not to say that there weren’t expectations. But the main expectation was that I worked to IMPROVE MYSELF as a teacher. I was expected to learn and get better at teaching. I wasn’t expected to figure out how to raise test scores.

So in light of that last paragraph, yes, I’m complaining. My teacher evaluation this year includes a VAM document that crunched a bunch of student achievement data FOR ME. I don’t even know for sure which kind of data was crunched. It also includes reading AND math data, even though I don’t teach math directly. I teach English Language Learners from multiple grade levels, some who speak very little of the language yet. Part of my score also includes data from the whole school. Why that’s done and how that’s done is a mystery. The only thing I really know about this newest system of data crunching for teacher evaluation is that my local union took a long, hard look at the company and their process and forced the administration to retrofit last year’s data (whatever would have been used) into their model so that we could see what the outcome for teachers’ evaluations would have been, to see how it would impact us. According to our union leaders, the system was going to rate a strong majority of teachers positively compared to past models they tried to thrust upon us that would have rated about half of us as either “Needs to Improve” or “Unsatisfactory” and would have put us on remediation plans. At least this time, the data would be used to find out what kind of growth students had made in the past year so that they could project what kind of growth each student was EXPECTED to make this year (known as a “propensity score”). At least this system was comparing each student’s growth to him or herself and not to an arbitrary standard or equally random “grade level” standard. That was an improvement.

But even so, this is the most mundane, boring, unproductive, least useful way I could be using my time. I have been doing some form of “top-down work” now for so many years that my mind has become resistant to it. I told a friend today that I have gone on “mental strike” against what I have to do. I have no autonomy…or so very little that what little I may actually have is really just a farce. The time I spend on Facebook learning about and engaging in the fight against corporate reform and working to save public schools is so much more fulfilling and educative. I learn about what other teachers are doing in their classrooms as they resist the nonsense that is being foisted up them, too! I get a lot of inspiration from them and from their ideas and actions that helps me continue getting out of bed each day and I realize that fighting for the classroom I had in 1992 or so is why I must continue to hang in there and do what I have to do while being creatively subversive when I need to be.

Now, on the other hand, I’m NOT complaining. This is because I know what the dire situations are across the country and I know that my situation, which was once quite dire, is much less so today. I still have my job and I am still fortunate to have absolutely beautiful, curious and excitable students that I get to work with every day. I have many parents in my school who still appreciate what teachers do for their kids and will support us as best they can. Even though we have our challenges with some families, we still pull together as a staff and support one another to find workable solutions to the problems we face. Our principal is also very realistic and supportive and values that which makes teaching and learning authentic and fun. Our school board has begun to listen to and value what the teachers say and have recently hired a new superintendent who is bringing what appears to be a new tone into the district.

So I have much to be thankful for, but must continue to work within a system that would like to see me fail. And that’s where my mind lies…in the middle of this quagmire.  I will trudge through it. I will “get ‘er done”. I look forward to being on the other side of it.

Happy Memorial Day to all! I hope your holiday weekend is full of relaxation, uninterrupted time with family and friends, great barbeques and fun in the sun.

I hope one day that I will be able to purposefully enjoy engaging in and completing my work in a more timely way so that I can join you in celebrating more holidays in the near future!

Please join with teachers to bring sanity and useful purpose back to our profession. Help put US back in charge of making it better! Thank you!

Literacy Expert to Obama on PARCC Test: Too Hard, Too Confusing, or Absurd?

About TeachingWhat knowledge is important? And who gets to decide?

This post by Diane Ravitch is a good follow-up to my post called “Reality Strikes.” It also explains how the level of difficulty of text and questions on the PARCC test are outrageous and make no sense.

But, something else also occurred to me when reading this. Diane ends with, “These are not good tests of reading comprehension. They are traps and snares.” So what is her conclusion? Does she think that the tests need to be improved or does the icon of fighting education reformers think Common Core $tate $tandards and the high-stakes tests that are inextricably linked should be eradicated altogether?

I wonder why this position wasn’t made clear at the end of her post. Would love clarification. I hope she will continue to advocate for an end to both!

Diane Ravitch's blog

Rebecca Steinitz is a literary consultant, writer, and editor in Massachusetts. She has a Ph. D. In English, coaches in urban districts, and has a daughter in seventh grade.

She wrote a letter to President Obama about the PARCC Tests, which her daughter must take, but the President’s will not.

Her daughter has always done well in school, but the PARCC test was a trial.

Here is a typical question:

“You have learned about electricity by reading two articles, “Energy Story” and “Conducting Solutions,” and viewing a video clip titled “Hands-On Science with Squishy Circuits.”In an essay, compare the purpose of the three sources. Then analyze how each source uses explanations, demonstrations, or descriptions of experiments to help accomplish its purpose. Be sure to discuss important differences and similarities between the information gained from the video and the information provided in the articles. Support your response with evidence from each…

View original post 300 more words

Reality Strikes

Bullying Teachers

A recent staff meeting was interesting. We had been asked by our principal to take a PARCC practice test (at least part of one) ahead of time so that we, as a staff, could have a discussion about it at this staff meeting. My principal is someone who I would not consider to be a drinker of corporate reform Kool-Aid, but who also seems to be, in my opinion, only somewhat aware of the larger issues involved in corporate education reform. He is the kind of person who doesn’t like to dwell on what he has “no control over.” That is an amiable quality in most cases and has helped us focus more on what we can and should do much of the time, rather than get overly frustrated with the nonsense that has been flooding into our daily existence as teachers. But this time, it was hard to focus on getting “past” the outrage.

The teachers couldn’t get over how HARD the tests were. I will say that I never heard the word “rigorous.” Not once. There had been those who, when the standards were first published, had taken a look at them and actually liked their organization. They thought that it “made sense” to start at kindergarten and  have the standards “spiral upward” from one grade to the next (yet they were DESIGNED BACKWARD from college level down to kindergarten). In professional development book groups, these same teachers had been engaged in reading about and discussing how to transition from the current set of state teaching standards to the new Common Core $tate $tandards and were pretty gung-ho about the mission of getting ready for “what was coming.” Some stated that we “had no choice” because the new standards were “the law” and “were here to stay.” After all, we teachers seem to have it in our DNA to rise to any occasion and “make it happen,” right?

But now there was a decidedly different feel in the room. The tenor of the discussion that followed had shifted from “let’s get ‘er done” to “this is ridiculous!!!” To his credit, the principal focused the discussion by asking teachers to notice what the demands of the test were, which did two things. First, it allowed teachers to vent about all the “major issues” they saw with the test. Second, he prepared us for the idea that we would look at those issues and see what was “within our control” to address through common sense instruction. Again, to his credit, he did suggest that he really wanted to see us continue the good quality instruction that he sees currently happening all over our building. And what he did suggest is that, based on these observations, maybe there were certain shifts or certain instructional techniques that we could implement that might help kids be more successful on these test when they are forced to face them next year.

So teachers noticed issues such as:

  • how sophisticated the level of text was for the grade level being tested;
  • how the excerpts were taken out of the context of the story in such a way that it really put the reader at a distinct disadvantage when trying to answer the questions without enough of the story line or background knowledge about relationships between characters;
  • how sometimes there seemed that there were at least two answers with supporting evidence for each that seemed like it COULD be correct and it wasn’t clear how the students were supposed to be able to figure out which one was more correct than the other, especially if we ADULTS weren’t sure;
  • how there were so many questions that required the student in one way or another to find evidence from the text to support their answer choice;
  • how busy the page looked and how students wouldn’t know what all of the tabs and buttons were for;
  • how there was more than one scroll bar on the screen at one time so students would need to know how to scroll the text of the story differently than scrolling to see the questions on the page;
  • how there could be up to three different texts that the student would have read and to be able to “keep in their head” as they thought about what the question was asking them in order to compare or to analyze;
  • how testing “stamina” was going to be an issue for MANY children, even those who hadn’t typically struggled in the past;
  • how there were essays that they would have to type with whatever keyboarding skills they had;
  • how they would have to type their essays into a text window that may require scrolling if their answer exceeds the space provided.

After compiling the list of what was noticed about how this test is different than the previous state standardized test and briefly talking about some the things teachers could do to help get kids ready to take this new test next year, teachers couldn’t help but share the angst that had been building up ever since they had taken the practice test themselves. One teacher said that we seriously need to get ready for students who are going to be emotionally and psychologically DEVASTATED by the experience of taking this test.

Others shared their own experiences and feelings as ADULTS when they took it. One teacher said that she had taken it at a time when she was pretty tired. She figured that her fatigued condition might somewhat mimic or help her compare her mental abilities at the time of the test to what a student’s ability might be like and she said that she was seriously straining to answer the questions and couldn’t imagine how frustrated and exhausted this was going to be for the students.

Another shared how she had her OWN son, who is a math whiz, take the math practice test. She said that not only was he exhausted when he was done, but he wasn’t even sure how well he may have done on it.  And yet another teacher actually asked a top engineer adult friend of hers to take a test and he didn’t see the importance or relevance of MANY of the questions on the test. He deemed it a HORRIBLE test of knowledge for ANYONE who would want to be ready for HIS career. And of course, that begs the question of, “How can ONE set of standards and ONE set of tests prepare all children everywhere for every possible career out there, including future ones that haven’t even been created yet?”

Near the end of the meeting, one of the comments that our empathetic principal made to a group of teachers that he recognized as “feeling panicked” was something like, “In New York where they have been field testing this test, their scores have dropped from around 70-80% testing proficient to around 25-30%. And historically, anytime a new test has been introduced, there has always been a drop in scores until everyone has had a chance to adjust to the changes that have been made. So just know that we won’t be the only ones experiencing these drops. It’s going to happen everywhere, across the whole country. And then something is going to have to happen so it will all wash out. They will have to do something.”

I followed up the principal’s remarks with a few of my own. I first made it clear that I was speaking 100% for myself and not for him or for anyone else. I told my colleagues that it was my opinion from all of the books I had been reading, education groups I had become members of and from conversations with other teachers all over the country that these tests and the CC$$ that we are being required to teach have been carefully designed to, in fact, PRODUCE this failure of our children. I said that the corporate backers and the politicians they have cozied up to are working together to ensure that they can continue to label our schools and us teachers as failures so that they can close our public schools and open up charter schools to come in and save the day. They plan to break our unions by replacing us horribly ineffective, veteran teachers with cheap Teach for America minimally-prepared, temporary teachers. They plan to sell all of the states that have bought into this scheme all new CC$$-aligned materials in addition to the new online tests which require upgrades of technological infrastructure in ALL schools across the country. Cha-ching!

I told them that, in MY opinion, now that they have gotten a look at this test and are beginning to see where it’s headed, that they MUST become active in the fight against these forces. I told them that I respectfully disagreed with our principal’s assertion that “it will all wash out” when people all over the country experience the same level of difficulties or failures. I said that I wanted to personally encourage each one of them to read the research that is out there that is connecting the dots between corporate billionaires and the politicians that have passed the laws that tie our evaluations to all of this nonsense. I told them that it was MY opinion that it wasn’t going to go away without a fight and that I hoped they would read books like Diane Ravitch’s Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools as well as Kris Nielsen’s Children of the Core and Uncommon: The Grassroots Movement to Save our Children and Their Schools. I encouraged them to search for groups to connect with so they could join with other teachers around the country to resist these destructive forces and to actively fight back to save our public school system.

Some heads were nodding as I spoke my piece. Many of them know that I have been speaking up about this for a long time. Some of my closer colleagues know that I “do my homework,” but even so some of them and many others have been waiting for it to pass, like so many other trends in education have done in the past. But I hope that after this bit of reality struck them recently, they will decide that there’s a good chance I may be right and that, in this case, it’s time to actually DO something about it!

The Two-Year Anniversary of This Blog: Today!

The Two-Year Anniversary of This Blog: Today!.

Diane Ravitch posted this yesterday. I wanted to re-post it here for a couple of reasons.

One is because I am thankful, so thankful, that she brought attention to the assault on teachers and our public school system when she did, especially so widely and on a daily basis. She gave me and so many others hope when there was nothing but despair all around me.  I do not put her up on a pedestal and find her infallible, but I respect her for all that she’s done and continues to do to bring much needed attention to the issues involved with the efforts underway (and have been for a very long time) by corporate reformers to privatize our children’s schools and limit their learning and to put pressures on the PTB (powers that be) to make changes and give back autonomy over our schools to those closest to them and who have the best know-how.

The second reason I appreciate her post is the following excerpt:

“My purpose when I started was to create a space where parents, students, teachers, principals, superintendents, public-spirited citizens, school board members, and anyone else who wishes to do so could share their ideas, dreams, fears, and hopes about the current state and future of American education. My guiding principle has been “a better education for all children.” I have never been so presumptuous as to assert that I know how to teach or that I have the answer to all questions. I rely on you, the readers, to share your knowledge and experiences as we together examine some of the ruinous policies now mandated by the federal government, policies that place more value on data than on children, that trust metrics more than professional judgment, and that prioritize standardized tests over learning and real education.

We have that space. We have the most vigorous discussion of education issues on the Internet. We don’t bar dissenting views [emphasis mine], although I do ban certain curse words that I don’t want on my blog and I do not tolerate personal insults. We even have trolls. I have said repeatedly that this blog is my virtual living room (although sometimes it is my virtual classroom), and I expect a certain level of civility. You may feel angry, and you can express your anger or frustration or rage, but please mind your language. And remember, if you want to insult me, do it on another blog, not here. Other than those rather limited rules, the floor is always open.”

Notice, she has rules–and not many of them, but she values open discourse and expects and encourages dissenting views. She’s not afraid of them! That’s the sign of a real leader!

So let me add my congratulations to her here and encourage others to read her blog if you don’t already!